Blog gratis
Reportar
Editar
¡Crea tu blog!
Compartir
¡Sorpréndeme!
Maquina de escribir con Internet
Blog para el cuestionamiento
« Blog
 
//14 de Febrero, 2008

The return of which never one went

por guillermogodoy a las 01:56, en General

"No is reconciliation (with Kirchner) because never there was fight";

 Lavagna Robert.

Note on the newspaper clarin of Buenos Aires

 

 In the middle of year 2006, I wrote an article in the Foundation Atlas 1853, on the candidacy of ex- minister of economy Roberto Lavagna. (http://www.atlas.org.ar/articulos/articulos.asp?Id=6357). The Pro-government Opponent, thus I labeled to the writing, in which it questioned, hard, the possibility that its candidacy meant a real alternative to the turn government. The main argument rested in the personal considerations on the aspiring and the structure that its candidacy laid the foundations.

Seven months later, I changed of opinion and I wrote I articulate denominated "electoral Tribalismo and Conditioned air Liberalism", in where although, the candidacy of the ex- minister, was not in the thematic epicenter, I tried to argue, that in an ill-fated and unfortunate context, the ideological details had to be in background, and Lavagna could mean an efficient alternative to oficialismo. (http://www.lahistoriaparalela.com.ar/2007/04/04/tribalismo-electoral-and-liberalism-of-air-prepared/) .

Responding to the leader to recreate, Ricardo Lopez Murphy, on its sayings on the ex- minister, I alleged: "Lavagna is not equal to Kirchner. The cause that has comprised of the national government not badly returns it in a coarse copy of an example. With same the parameters it could say that Pellegrini (if, the man who did) he was equal to Juárez Celman and the main person in charge of the financial debacle because it comprised of the dominant conduction. Pellegrini integrated the political project that caused the crisis of the 90, but also, he was the main manager of the Argentina recovery.

Pellegrini was not equal to Juárez Celman, Lavagna is not equal to Néstor Kirchner." This I articulate, controversial, caused several you criticize, but hostile that elogiosas, between that is the following one, originating of an anonymous visitor of the pagina historiaparalela.com, that I would like to stand out: "Because R. Lo'pez Murphy? Because non R. Lavagna or J. Sobisch. Then by that old one they will refrán that it says, "The one that is burned with milk, when it sees a cow cries. "O we will allow again that the destroyers of the country, of the Pcia. of Bs. As of the Argentine economy and the greater people in charge of the gigantic swindle of the pasifity they retake the power. - The Duhalde, the Alfonsin and all the group of unsuitable, authors of the greater sin of all than are that to destroy the confidence publishes."-

On the other hand, own Lopez Murphy responded me square to my personal. On the matter he said: "Lavagna is a project to our antipodal ones, that it conceptually does not defer from Kirchner, safe in the commentaries and crude attitudes, that do not have them in equal magnitude. It tries, the country closed and corporative of the past and in that sense, he is more opposing than Kirchner, whose policy in any case runs for pragmatic reasons, by the same footpath. The president lacks a referential frame and he has not been prepared for it. Single worries it to have left itself in the power with the variant that is ". The present events, the reconciliation Lavagna- Kirchner, demonstrate how mistaken was I, and whichever reason tapeworm Lopez Murphy and the critical of that article, on the point in reference.

In this sense it goes my recognition and sincere self-criticism. Single it is to reflect on the meaning of this political event, that is extraordinarily important, since it raises an institutional catastrophe, if it is considered that three million Argentineans voted the candidacy of Lavagna Robert, who sustained itself in criticizing to the oficialismo with which today he is associated. Perhaps in a as dangerous context as the present one, the ideological details had to happen to background, but at that moment I forgot the moral considerations and the ethical limits, that sometimes united to two different personalities in the ideological thing, like Carrió - Lopez Murphy. In this sense, I must give the reason him to the sayings of Carrió in the occasion of the possibility of alliance with the leader of recreating: "the problem of Argentina is not ideological, but moral". I must give the reason him, and also to the radicals that accompanied it, like Stolbízer Daisy, still more considering the following facts that framed the agreement Lavagna- Kirchner.

The one in charge of the approach, the national senator Jose Pampuro, explained that " I have been speaking from kill a time with lavagna and it was not dificial that reached an agreement", and he added, that " beginning conversations the last year and went away giving the moments to close the political agreement ". On the other hand Lavagna said to the daily Clarín, " We have been in agreement  (with Kirchner) in which the moment had arrived for rescuing to the Justicialismo on the base of the diversity, always within same philosofy". The Peronist philosophy, notion that has the advantage to lack meaning precise and to be sustained in a total theoretical  extreme poverty, single serves as excuse to advocate pacts, that single watch at the power and not the well-being of the country. Lavagna in addition looked for to justify the agreement when assuring that the PJ "one is politico party that is on the verge of falling" and that " it was in freezing".

The one that it is on the verge of falling it is the Argentine Republic, after the "Peronist PJ" which it has been having political presence in the national life for more than 50 years, and that the country of followed form governs, for almost 20 years. But Lavagna happens to constitute a mere anecdote if we consider the responsibility of numerous provincial structures, like Independent Citizens in Tucumán, and Renovador Party in Jumps, and important national structures, like UCR, the MID, part of the Peronism, Democratic Party, the PNC-UNIR, many of them formed by valuable and honest leaders, that they supported the candidacy of the ex- minister. In dialogue with America radio, the radical leader,Gerardo Morales, assured that he was "surprised" by driving of Lavagna and he asserted that "he finalizes doing what the radicals K do, that go away safe from power". Gerardo  Morales said to have thought that the ex- minister Lavagna,” would maintain its convictions " and it was asked: " Where it is left everything what said of Cristina and Kirchner? Now one removes photos with él".

Yesterday, national senator Arturo Vera, described as "cheater" to Lavagna. "the entrerriano radicalismo has a political authority to say this, because he was one of the districts that showed with greater clarity his reluctance to this candidacy and we accepted it being men of a party that it tries to continue being national". Whichever reason tapeworm senator Ernesto Sanz, when it said that the agreement with Lavagna had finished Sunday 28, 18hs. The radicalismo must drop with the same stone. And once and for all, it must move away of the pernicious advice of the main creator of the candidacy of Lavagna, ex- president Raul Alfonsi'n, man whom the only merito has to sink in the loss of prestige, the disorder and the electoral impotence, to an extraordinary, powerful and historical party. Memory that got angry when they did not want to understand that that was the "better option" for the radicals. And it said things that to the light of the recent events, sound tragic comedians: "radicals K do not exist and are treasonous to the principles of the UCR", however of his candidate, today kirchnerista, it said that "it guarantees the governability".

This group of leaders that leads structures that sustained the candidacy of Lavagna, in as much do not recognize that ingenuous cynical “engañadores” were deceived or, they deceive their comrades, we must continue thinking that they have not changed and that single they wait for circumstances more favorable than the present ones, to make their return.

 

Jose Guillermo Godoy

President of the National Training center of Intereses Filial Tucumán. Member of the Program of local leaders of the Foundation Atlas 1853.

Palabras claves , ,
1 Comentario  ·  Recomendar
 
Comentarios (1) ·  Enviar comentario
very interesting your news press, but in my country, we considered that the argentina is a change country chaves formality,and besides, your president womem is a bad girl,your husband is a cornudo man and your minister a gays men, a disaster.-
publicado por ramon garcia, el 19.02.2008 02:10
Enviar comentario

Nombre:

E-Mail (no será publicado):

Sitio Web (opcional):

Recordar mis datos.
Escriba el código que visualiza en la imagen Escriba el código [Regenerar]:
Formato de texto permitido: <b>Negrita</b>, <i>Cursiva</i>, <u>Subrayado</u>,
<li>· Lista</li>
Sobre mí
FOTO

Jose Guillermo Godoy



Ver perfil

Calendario
Ver mes anterior Marzo 2024 Ver mes siguiente
DOLUMAMIJUVISA
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31
Buscador
Blog   Web
Tópicos
General (1)
Nube de tags  [?]
Secciones
Inicio
Contacto
Enlaces
FULLServices Network | Blog profesional | Privacidad